Interictal high-frequency oscillations generated by seizure onset and eloquent areas may be differentially coupled with different slow waves

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.03.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Interictal HFOs were noted in seizure-onset and sensorimotor–visual sites during sleep.

  • Epileptogenic HFOs may be more preferentially coupled with slow waves of 3–4 Hz.

  • Physiologic HFOs may be more preferentially coupled with slow waves of 0.5–1 Hz.

Abstract

Objective

High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) can be spontaneously generated by seizure-onset and functionally-important areas. We determined if consideration of the spectral frequency bands of coupled slow-waves could distinguish between epileptogenic and physiological HFOs.

Methods

We studied a consecutive series of 13 children with focal epilepsy who underwent extraoperative electrocorticography. We measured the occurrence rate of HFOs during slow-wave sleep at each electrode site. We subsequently determined the performance of HFO rate for localization of seizure-onset sites and undesirable detection of nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites defined by neurostimulation. We likewise determined the predictive performance of modulation index: MI(XHz)&(YHz), reflecting the strength of coupling between amplitude of HFOsXHz and phase of slow-waveYHz. The predictive accuracy was quantified using the area under the curve (AUC) on receiver-operating characteristics analysis.

Results

Increase in HFO rate localized seizure-onset sites (AUC  0.72; p < 0.001), but also undesirably detected nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites (AUC  0.58; p < 0.001). Increase in MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz) also detected both seizure-onset (AUC  0.74; p < 0.001) and nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites (AUC  0.59; p < 0.001). Increase in subtraction-MIHFOs [defined as subtraction of MI(HFOs)&(0.5–1Hz) from MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz)] localized seizure-onset sites (AUC  0.71; p < 0.001), but rather avoided detection of nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites (AUC  0.42; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that epileptogenic HFOs may be coupled with slow-wave3–4Hz more preferentially than slow-wave0.5–1Hz, whereas physiologic HFOs with slow-wave0.5–1Hz more preferentially than slow-wave3–4Hz during slow-wave sleep.

Significance

Further studies in larger samples are warranted to determine if consideration of the spectral frequency bands of slow-waves coupled with HFOs can positively contribute to presurgical evaluation of patients with focal epilepsy.

Introduction

Extraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG) is commonly utilized as a part of presurgical evaluation for patients with medically-uncontrolled focal seizures in a number of epilepsy centers. The ultimate purpose of extraoperative ECoG is localization of the epileptogenic zone of which surgical resection results in seizure control as well as delineation of the eloquent areas of which preservation minimizes the risk of postoperative functional deficits (Rosenow and Lüders, 2001). The gold-standard electrophysiological biomarkers for estimation of the epileptogenic zone include the seizure-onset zone involved in generation of habitual seizures, namely, the electrode site(s) initially showing the ictal ECoG discharges prior to habitual seizures (Asano et al., 2009). Conversely, significance of seizure-onset zones involved in non-habitual seizures is currently unknown (Kovac et al., 2014). A long period of extraoperative ECoG recording may be undesirably needed to capture habitual seizures, and some patients do not achieve seizure-freedom even after complete resection of the seizure-onset zone (Asano et al., 2009). Thus, investigators are currently looking for alternative biomarkers estimating the extent of the epileptogenic zone.

Promising candidate biomarkers include interictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) spontaneously and intermittently generated during resting periods (Jacobs et al., 2012, Zijlmans et al., 2012). Studies of both pediatric and adult populations reported that surgical failure was associated with a high rate of interictal HFOs generated by the non-resected tissues during non-REM sleep and under general anesthesia (Jacobs et al., 2010, Wu et al., 2010, Akiyama et al., 2011, van’t Klooster et al., 2015). A large number of investigators independently reported that electrode sites frequently generating HFOs often turn out to be a part of the seizure-onset zones (Staba et al., 2002, Bagshaw et al., 2009, Crépon et al., 2010, Akiyama et al., 2011, Blanco et al., 2011, Gliske et al., 2016, Sakuraba et al., 2015). Sites showing HFOs>80Hz and HFOs>250Hz are often overlapped in space (Jacobs et al., 2011), but HFOs>80Hz are generated by larger brain regions (Zijlmans et al., 2012). Some studies suggested that the occurrence rate of HFOs>250Hz predicted the postoperative seizure outcome somewhat better than that of HFOs>80Hz (Akiyama et al., 2011, van’t Klooster et al., 2015). Others suggested that HFOs>80Hz may be more useful than HFOs>250Hz, which are difficult to detect in a substantial proportion of patients with neocortical epilepsy (Blanco et al., 2011, Wang et al., 2013).

Despite the efforts of many investigators, the clinical utility of interictal HFOs still remains uncertain (Jobst, 2013), particularly because HFOs are frequently generated by nonepileptic visual, somatosensory, motor, and auditory cortices during resting periods (Blanco et al., 2011, Fukushima et al., 2012, Nagasawa et al., 2012, Melani et al., 2013, Wang et al., 2013, Alkawadri et al., 2014, van’t Klooster et al., 2015). The current recommendation is that one should not determine the resection margin solely based on the occurrence rate or spectral frequency band of interictal HFOs (Engel et al., 2009, Asano et al., 2013, Gliske et al., 2016). A method that can distinguish epileptogenic from physiologic HFOs in an automatic and efficient manner is highly desirable.

Our central hypothesis was that consideration of the spectral frequency band of slow-waves coupled with HFOs would improve the specificity of prediction of seizure-onset zone responsible for generation of habitual seizures. Our preliminary study of interictal ECoG during slow-wave sleep showed that HFOs in the nonepileptic occipital pole were strictly coupled with slow wave at 1 Hz and below, whereas HFOs in the seizure-onset zones coupled with slow wave at 3–4 Hz also (Nagasawa et al., 2012). Another group reported that both nonepileptic visual and sensorimotor areas can frequently generate interictal HFOs independent from interictal spike discharges (Wang et al., 2013). It is plausible that seizure-onset zone could be predicted by measuring in situ modulation index: MI(HFOs)&(slow-wave), a measure that reflects the degree of stability of phase–amplitude coupling between HFO amplitude and slow-wave phase (Canolty et al., 2006). In theory, MI(>XHz)&(YHz) is greater if a larger amplitude of HFOs>XHz are more consistently coupled with a phase of slow-waveYHz. Here, we measured MI at all electrode sites during interictal state on the first evening of extraoperative ECoG recording, using an open source toolbox EEGLAB and its extension Phase–Amplitude Coupling Toolbox (PACT) that incorporates the algorithm and routines for measurement of MI (Miyakoshi et al., 2013).

The first aim of this study was to determine, using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, how accurately the rates of HFOs>80Hz, HFOs>150Hz, and HFOs>250Hz predicted the seizure-onset sites. The next aim was to determine how accurately, but undesirably, the rates of these HFO rates detected the nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites clinically defined by neurostimulation. We subsequently measured MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz) and MI(HFOs)&(0.5–1Hz) at all electrode sites, and determined how accurately the seizure-onset and nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites were detected by MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz) and MI(HFOs)&(0.5–1Hz), respectively. According to the results of previous studies (Nagasawa et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2013), we expected that seizure-onset sites would be associated with increased MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz) and that nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites would be associated with increased MI(HFOs)&(0.5–1Hz). Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that subtraction-MIHFOs [defined as subtraction of MI(HFOs)&(0.5–1Hz) from MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz)] would localize the seizure-onset sites with reduced detection of the nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites.

Section snippets

Patients

The inclusion criteria consisted of: (i) a two-stage epilepsy surgery using extraoperative subdural ECoG recording in Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, between October 2013 and September 2014, (ii) ECoG sampling from all four lobes of the affected hemisphere, and (iii) habitual seizures captured during extraoperative ECoG recording. The exclusion criteria consisted of (i) presence of massive brain malformations, such as large porencephaly, perisylvian polymicrogyria, or

Patient profile

A cortical lesion was appreciated on MRI in four patients (Table 1). The remaining nine patients had normal or nonspecific MRI findings, whereas focal or lateralized glucose hypometabolism was noted on PET in all patients. Extraoperative ECoG recording showed that the median number of seizure-onset electrode sites was 10 (range: 1–36; Supplementary Table S1). Neurostimulation mapping localized both somatosensory, motor, and visual sites in all 13 patients (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Clinical implications

The present study demonstrated that HFOs are commonly generated by both ‘seizure-onset sites determined by extraoperative ECoG recording’ and ‘nonepileptic sensorimotor–visual sites defined by neurostimulation mapping’. The novel findings include that the spatial distribution of rate of HFOs was similar to those of MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz) and MI(HFOs)&(0.5–1Hz). MI(HFOs)&(3–4Hz) localized the seizure-onset sites with a comparable accuracy with the occurrence rate of HFOs and with a better accuracy

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grant NS64033 (to E. Asano) as well as the intramural grant from Children’s Hospital of Michigan Foundation (to E. Asano). We are grateful to Harry T. Chugani, MD, and Carol Pawlak, REEG/EPT at Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University for the collaboration and assistance in performing the studies described above.

Conflict of interest: None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest to be disclosed.

References (76)

  • A. Haseeb et al.

    Young patients with focal seizures may have the primary motor area for the hand in the postcentral gyrus

    Epilepsy Res

    (2007)
  • G.M. Ibrahim et al.

    Dynamic modulation of epileptic high frequency oscillations by the phase of slower cortical rhythms

    Exp Neurol

    (2014)
  • J. Jacobs et al.

    High-frequency changes during interictal spikes detected by time-frequency analysis

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2011)
  • J. Jacobs et al.

    High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) in clinical epilepsy

    Prog Neurobiol

    (2012)
  • K. Kojima et al.

    Clinical significance and developmental changes of auditory-language-related gamma activity

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2013)
  • G. Kumar et al.

    Olfactory hallucinations elicited by electrical stimulation via subdural electrodes: effects of direct stimulation of olfactory bulb and tract

    Epilepsy Behav

    (2012)
  • N. Matsuzaki et al.

    Upright face-preferential high-gamma responses in lower-order visual areas: evidence from intracranial recordings in children

    Neuroimage

    (2015)
  • F. Melani et al.

    Continuous high frequency activity: a peculiar SEEG pattern related to specific brain regions

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2013)
  • B.E. Mouthaan et al.

    Single pulse electrical stimulation to identify epileptogenic cortex: clinical information obtained from early evoked responses

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2016)
  • D. Nayak et al.

    Can single pulse electrical stimulation provoke responses similar to spontaneous interictal epileptiform discharges?

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2014)
  • J. Onton et al.

    Information-based modeling of event-related brain dynamics

    Prog Brain Res

    (2006)
  • H. Otsubo et al.

    High-frequency oscillations of ictal muscle activity and epileptogenic discharges on intracranial EEG in a temporal lobe epilepsy patient

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2008)
  • R. Sakuraba et al.

    High frequency oscillations are less frequent but more specific to epileptogenicity during rapid eye movement sleep

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2016)
  • C.E. Schroeder et al.

    Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection

    Trends Neurosci

    (2009)
  • M. Steriade et al.

    Neuronal plasticity in thalamocortical networks during sleep and waking oscillations

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • T. Akiyama et al.

    Focal resection of fast ripples on extraoperative intracranial EEG improves seizure outcome in pediatric epilepsy

    Epilepsia

    (2011)
  • R. Alkawadri et al.

    The spatial and signal characteristics of physiologic high frequency oscillations

    Epilepsia

    (2014)
  • C. Alvarado-Rojas et al.

    Slow modulations of high-frequency activity (40–140-Hz) discriminate preictal changes in human focal epilepsy

    Sci Rep

    (2014)
  • E. Asano et al.

    Quantitative interictal subdural EEG analyses in children with neocortical epilepsy

    Epilepsia

    (2003)
  • E. Asano et al.

    Role of subdural electrocorticography in prediction of long-term seizure outcome in epilepsy surgery

    Brain

    (2009)
  • A.P. Bagshaw et al.

    Effect of sleep stage on interictal high-frequency oscillations recorded from depth macroelectrodes in patients with focal epilepsy

    Epilepsia

    (2009)
  • A.J. Bell et al.

    An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution

    Neural Comput

    (1995)
  • A.T. Berg et al.

    New concepts in classification of the epilepsies: entering the 21st century

    Epilepsia

    (2011)
  • J.A. Blanco et al.

    Data mining neocortical high-frequency oscillations in epilepsy and controls

    Brain

    (2011)
  • H. Blumenfeld et al.

    Corticothalamic inputs control the pattern of activity generated in thalamocortical networks

    J Neurosci

    (2000)
  • R.T. Canolty et al.

    High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex

    Science

    (2006)
  • D. Contreras et al.

    Mechanisms of long-lasting hyperpolarizations underlying slow sleep oscillations in cat corticothalamic networks

    J Physiol

    (1996)
  • B. Crépon et al.

    Mapping interictal oscillations greater than 200 Hz recorded with intracranial macroelectrodes in human epilepsy

    Brain

    (2010)
  • Cited by (84)

    • Higher phase-amplitude coupling between ripple and slow oscillations indicates the distribution of epileptogenicity in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis

      2022, Seizure
      Citation Excerpt :

      We have also reported that phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) using a modulation index (MI) could be useful as a biomarker indicating the EZ in various etiologies [19, 20]. For PAC analysis, the combination of ripples and FRs at 3–4 Hz has been shown to be the most effective frequency band for locating the EZ in interictal ECoG [21, 22]. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that 1) HFO and PAC analyses from ioECoG can be useful in delineating the EZ in TLE with HS, and 2) that besides the mesial temporal structures, there exists an epileptogenic network in the lateral temporal neocortex.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text