A meta-analysis of cortical inhibition and excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatric disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of inhibition and excitation in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SCZ).

Methods

Paradigms included: short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI), cortical silent period (CSP), resting motor threshold, intracortical facilitation, and motor evoked potential amplitude. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase Psychiatry and PsycINFO 1990 through April 2012.

Results

A significant Hedge’s g was found for decreased SICI (g = 0.572, 95% confidence interval [0.179, 0.966], p = 0.004), enhanced intracortical facilitation (g = 0.446, 95% confidence interval [0.042, 0.849], p = 0.030) and decreased CSP (g = −0.466, 95% confidence interval [−0.881, −0.052], p = 0.027) within the OCD population. For MDD, significant effect sizes were demonstrated for decreased SICI (g = 0.641, 95% confidence interval [0.384, 0.898], p = 0.000) and shortened CSP (g = −1.232, 95% confidence interval [−1.530, −0.933], p = 0.000). In SCZ, a significant Hedge’s g was shown for decreased SICI (g = 0.476, 95% confidence interval [0.331, 0.620], p = 0.000).

Conclusion

Inhibitory deficits are a ubiquitous finding across OCD, MDD, SCZ and enhancement of intracortical facilitation is specific to OCD.

Significance

Provides a clear platform from which diagnostic procedures can be developed.

Highlights

Motor cortex inhibitory and excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigms were quantitatively assessed in severe psychiatric illnesses. ► Inhibitory deficits are a ubiquitous finding across obsessive–compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia, by contrast, enhancement of intracortical facilitation is specific to obsessive–compulsive disorder. ► Limitations of transcranial magnetic stimulation studies are reviewed and potential future applications are discussed.

Introduction

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, critical for the modulation of cortical excitability and neuroplasticity (DeFelipe et al., 1986, Schieber and Hibbard, 1993). GABAergic neurons constitute 25–30% of the neuronal population in the motor cortex and their horizontal connections can extend up to 6 mm or more (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1992, Jones, 1993). Pyramidal cell activity is synchronized through a balance of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials and excitatory postsynaptic potentials (Krnjevic, 1997). Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials are generated by GABAergic interneurons terminating on the pyramidal cell (Krnjevic, 1997). Cortical inhibition is a neurophysiological mechanism whereby GABA inhibitory interneurons attenuate the activity of other neurons (e.g. pyramidal neurons) in the cortex (Daskalakis et al., 2007).

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method used to assess inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms. TMS was first introduced in 1985 by Barker et al. for investigating the state of motor pathways in patients with neurological disorders and in healthy participants (Barker et al., 1985). They showed that a single TMS pulse applied to the motor cortex could activate cortical tissues associated with the hand or leg muscles and elicit motor evoked potentials (Fig. 1A).

TMS has been used to assess inhibitory processes, these paradigms are referred to as the cortical silent period (CSP) (Cantello et al., 1992), long-interval cortical inhibition (LICI) (Valls-Sole et al., 1992), and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) (Kujirai et al., 1993). The CSP duration is measured from the motor evoked potential onset to the return of electromyography activity (Fig. 1B) (Cantello et al., 1992). LICI involves the pairing of a suprathreshold conditioning stimulus followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus at long interstimulus intervals, resulting in inhibition of the motor evoked potential (Valls-Sole et al., 1992) (Fig. 1C). CSP and LICI appear to be assessing GABAB receptor-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission as evidenced by pharmacological studies (McDonnell et al., 2006, Siebner et al., 1998), the time course of the GABAB inhibitory postsynaptic potential (McCormick, 1989, Siebner et al., 1998, Werhahn et al., 1999) and the high intensity suprathreshold conditioning stimulus (Sanger et al., 2001). By contrast, SICI is measured by applying a subthreshold conditioning stimulus before the suprathreshold test stimulus at short interstimulus intervals, resulting in inhibition of the motor evoked potential response by 50–90% (Fig. 1D) (Kujirai et al., 1993). SICI has been associated with the GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission as demonstrated by the pharmacological effects on this measure (Ziemann et al., 1996a), the time course of the GABAA inhibitory postsynaptic potential (Wang and Buzsaki, 1996) and the low intensity subthreshold conditioning stimulus (Sanger et al., 2001).

TMS has also been used to examine cortical excitability, these paradigms include: the motor evoked potential amplitude, resting motor threshold, and intracortical facilitation. The motor evoked potential amplitude is measured as the average response to a series of pulses applied at a consistent TMS intensity (Zaaroor et al., 2003). The resting motor threshold is defined as the minimal intensity that produces a motor evoked potential >50 μV in 5 of 10 trials in a relaxed muscle (Rossini et al., 1994). Finally, intracortical facilitation is a paired-pulse paradigm whereby a conditioning stimulus is applied to the motor cortex before the test stimulus, resulting in an enhanced motor evoked potential (Kujirai et al., 1993, Nakamura et al., 1997) (Fig. 1E). Intracortical facilitation originates from excitatory postsynaptic potentials transmitted by N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamate receptors (Nakamura et al., 1997). For a review of the pharmacological effects on inhibitory and excitatory TMS paradigms, please see (Paulus et al., 2008).

Numerous studies have implicated GABA in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders, notably obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar disorder. Several lines of evidence suggest that cortical inhibition is impaired in these disorders. For example, previous TMS studies have demonstrated deficits in cortical inhibition assessed from the motor cortex in patients with OCD (Greenberg et al., 1998, Greenberg et al., 2000, Richter et al., 2012), MDD (Bajbouj et al., 2006, Fitzgerald et al., 2004a, Lefaucheur et al., 2008, Levinson et al., 2010), SCZ (Daskalakis et al., 2002, Daskalakis et al., 2008a, Fitzgerald et al., 2002a, Fitzgerald et al., 2002b, Fitzgerald et al., 2003, Liu et al., 2009, Wobrock et al., 2008, Wobrock et al., 2009, Wobrock et al., 2010) and bipolar disorder (Levinson et al., 2007). An overall deficit of GABAergic inhibition has been associated with these psychiatric disorders; however, each may have a distinct illness profile and response to treatment. This meta-analysis aims to quantitatively assess TMS evoked measures of inhibitory and excitatory paradigms in OCD, MDD and SCZ.

Section snippets

Data sources

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase Psychiatry and PsycINFO 1990 through April 2012.

A description of the exact search terms used:

motor cortex tms and psychiatry, motor cortex tms and mental disorder, motor cortex tms and psychiatric disorder, motor cortex tms and anxiety disorder, motor cortex tms and bipolar disorder, motor cortex tms and mania, motor cortex tms and depression, motor cortex tms and obsessivecompulsive disorder, motor cortex tms and

Results

Table 1 provides the total number of studies that fulfilled the 9 stated criteria for inclusion (described in the methods) and the total number of studies excluded based upon specified reasons. The search was completed by N.R. and the studies were checked for reliability by D.R.J. Studies met the checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using TMS (Chipchase et al., 2012).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide a quantitative summary of TMS studies evaluating inhibition and excitatory paradigms in severe psychiatric disorders. The literature included ample high-quality studies with effect sizes in the low to moderate and moderate to high range. We found decreased SICI, enhanced intracortical facilitation and reduced CSP within the OCD population. For MDD, decreases in CSP and SICI were demonstrated. Lastly, reductions in SICI were shown in SCZ

Clinical implications

This study provides compelling evidence to suggest that impairments in GABAergic inhibition are involved in the pathophysiology of OCD, MDD and SCZ, nevertheless, the overall pattern of these deficits differs. For example, in OCD, research has found inhibitory deficits and enhanced intracortical facilitation, independent of medication status (Greenberg et al., 1998, Greenberg et al., 2000, Richter et al., 2012). By contrast, Levinson et al. (Levinson et al., 2010) found that all MDD patients

Limitations

This study is limited in several ways. First, studies assessing patients with OCD compared to healthy controls had small sample sizes with limited amount of studies published in this field, more work needs to be done in this population. Also, there is an overall lack of diagnostic specificity of these neurophysiological deficits due to the overlap in results. It has been shown that pharmacological treatment can have an effect on cortical inhibition in healthy participants, (Langguth et al., 2008

Conclusion

In conclusion, this meta-analytic review of motor cortex TMS paradigms in OCD, MDD and SCZ have revealed promising findings for objective clinical applications. This study provides a meaningful summary of research in this field demonstrating a clear platform from which further studies and diagnostic procedures can be developed.

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

ZJD received external funding through Neuronetics and Brainsway Ltd, Aspect Medical and a travel allowance through Pfizer and Merck. ZJD has also received speaker funding through Sepracor Inc and served on the advisory board for Hoffmann-La Roche Limited. This work was supported by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation (OMHF), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Brain and Behaviour Research Foundation and the Grant Family through the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

References (81)

  • P.B. Fitzgerald et al.

    Motor cortical excitability and clinical response to rTMS in depression

    J Affect Disord

    (2004)
  • P.B. Fitzgerald et al.

    Reduced plastic brain responses in schizophrenia: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

    Schizophr Res

    (2004)
  • P.B. Fitzgerald et al.

    A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of abnormal cortical inhibition in schizophrenia

    Psychiatry Res

    (2003)
  • B.D. Greenberg et al.

    Decreased neuronal inhibition in cerebral cortex in obsessive–compulsive disorder on transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Lancet

    (1998)
  • A. Hasan et al.

    Deficient inhibitory cortical networks in antipsychotic-naive subjects at risk of developing first-episode psychosis and first-episode schizophrenia patients: a cross-sectional study

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • J.P. Lefaucheur et al.

    Inter-hemispheric asymmetry of motor corticospinal excitability in major depression studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    J Psychiatr Res

    (2008)
  • A.J. Levinson et al.

    Evidence of cortical inhibitory deficits in major depressive disorder

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • D.A. Lewis et al.

    Altered GABA neurotransmission and prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia

    Biol Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • S.K. Liu et al.

    The relationship between cortical inhibition, antipsychotic treatment, and the symptoms of schizophrenia

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • P. Manganotti et al.

    Intravenous clomipramine decreases excitability of human motor cortex. A study with paired magnetic stimulation

    J Neurol Sci

    (2001)
  • A. Minelli et al.

    Effects of intravenous antidepressant drugs on the excitability of human motor cortex: a study with paired magnetic stimulation on depressed patients

    Brain Stimul

    (2010)
  • T. Oxley et al.

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals abnormal plastic response to premotor cortex stimulation in schizophrenia

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • A. Pascual-Leone et al.

    Motor cortical excitability in schizophrenia

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • W. Paulus et al.

    State of the art: pharmacologic effects on cortical excitability measures tested by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Brain Stimulation

    (2008)
  • E. Robol et al.

    Effects of citalopram on the excitability of the human motor cortex: a paired magnetic stimulation study

    J Neurol Sci

    (2004)
  • P.M. Rossini et al.

    Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1994)
  • E. Soubasi et al.

    Cortical motor neurophysiology of patients with schizophrenia: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Psychiatry Res

    (2010)
  • J. Valls-Sole et al.

    Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1992)
  • T. Wobrock et al.

    Reduced cortical inhibition in first-episode schizophrenia

    Schizophr Res

    (2008)
  • M. Zaaroor et al.

    Time course of motor excitability before and after a task-related movement

    Neurophysiol Clin

    (2003)
  • U. Ziemann et al.

    Changes in human motor cortex excitability induced by dopaminergic and anti-dopaminergic drugs

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1997)
  • P.D. Arnold et al.

    Glutamate transporter gene SLC1A1 associated with obsessive–compulsive disorder

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • M. Bajbouj et al.

    Abnormalities of inhibitory neuronal mechanisms in the motor cortex of patients with schizophrenia

    Pharmacopsychiatry

    (2004)
  • B. Boroojerdi et al.

    Transcallosal inhibition and motor conduction studies in patients with schizophrenia using transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • R. Cantello et al.

    Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential

    Neurology

    (1992)
  • E. Chroni et al.

    Effect of exercise on motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatric patients

    J Clin Neurophysiol

    (2002)
  • Z.J. Daskalakis et al.

    Evidence for impaired cortical inhibition in schizophrenia using transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • Z.J. Daskalakis et al.

    Increased cortical inhibition in persons with schizophrenia treated with clozapine

    J Psychopharmacol

    (2008)
  • Z.J. Daskalakis et al.

    Long-interval cortical inhibition from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS–EEG study

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2008)
  • J. DeFelipe et al.

    Long-range focal collateralization of axons arising from corticocortical cells in monkey sensory-motor cortex

    J Neurosci

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text