« BackClinical Neurophysiology
Article in Press

The auditory P200 is both increased and reduced in schizophrenia? A meta-analytic dissociation of the effect for standard and target stimuli in the oddball task

  • F. Ferreira-Santos

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Dr. Manuel Pereira da Silva, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +351 226 079 700; fax: +351 226 079 725.
    • FFS and CS are joint first authors of this article.
  • ,
  • C. Silveira

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal and Psychiatry Services, Hospital S. João, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
    • FFS and CS are joint first authors of this article.
  • ,
  • P.R. Almeida

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Dr. Manuel Pereira da Silva, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
  • ,
  • A. Palha

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal and Psychiatry Services, Hospital S. João, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
  • ,
  • F. Barbosa

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Dr. Manuel Pereira da Silva, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
  • ,
  • J. Marques-Teixeira

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Dr. Manuel Pereira da Silva, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal

Accepted 28 November 2011. published online 26 December 2011.
Corrected Proof

Highlights

► Conflicting reports of P200 abnormalities in schizophrenia have been meta-analyzed. ► P200 in schizophrenia is smaller for standard tones, and larger for target tones. ► This stimulus effect partially accounts for the conflicting findings.

Abstract 

Objective

Conflicting reports of P200 amplitude and latency in schizophrenia have suggested that this component is increased, reduced or does not differ from healthy subjects. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to accurately describe P200 deficits in auditory oddball tasks in schizophrenia.

Methods

A systematic search identified 20 studies which were meta-analyzed. Effect size (ES) estimates were obtained: P200 amplitude and latency for target and standard tones at midline electrodes.

Results

The ES obtained for amplitude (Cz) for standard and target stimuli indicate significant effects in opposite directions: standard stimuli elicit smaller P200 in patients (d=−0.36; 95% CI [−0.26, −0.08]); target stimuli elicit larger P200 in patients (d=0.48; 95% CI [0.16, 0.82]). A similar effect occurs for latency at Cz, which is shorter for standards (d=−0.32; 95% CI [−0.54, −0.10]) and longer for targets (d=0.42; 95% CI [0.23, 0.62]). Meta-regression analyses revealed that samples with more males show larger ES for amplitude of target stimuli, while the amount of medication was negatively associated with the ES for the latency of standards.

Conclusions

The results obtained suggest that claims of reduced or augmented P200 in schizophrenia based on the sole examination of standard or target stimuli fail to consider the stimulus effect.

Significance

Quantification of effects for standard and target stimuli is a required first step to understand the nature of P200 deficits in schizophrenia.

Keywords: P200, Event-related potential (ERP), Auditory oddball, Schizophrenia, Meta-analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1388-2457(11)00831-5

doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.11.036

« BackClinical Neurophysiology