Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 121, Issue 4 , Pages 524-532 , April 2010

A sustained deviance response evoked by the auditory oddball paradigm

,Accepted 28 November 2009.

References 

  1. Alain C, Woods DL. Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:534–546
  2. Anderson LA, Christianson GB, Linden JF. Stimulus-specific adaptation occurs in the auditory thalamus. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7359–7363
  3. Bartlett EL, Wang X. Long-lasting modulation by stimulus context in primate auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:83–104
  4. Berg P, Scherg M. A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:229–241
  5. Brosch M, Schreiner CE. Time course of forward masking tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:923–943
  6. Butler RA. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am. 1968;44:945–950
  7. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:201–215
  8. Csepe V, Pantev C, Hoke M, Hampson S, Ross B. Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: localization of the mismatch field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;84:538–548
  9. Dimitrijevic A, Lolli B, Michalewski HJ, Pratt H, Zeng FG, Starr A. Intensity changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials comparison with frequency changes. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:374–383
  10. Dimitrijevic A, Michalewski HJ, Zeng FG, Pratt H, Starr A. Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:2111–2124
  11. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993;
  12. Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998;10:590–604
  13. Galaburda A, Sanides F. Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1980;90:597–610
  14. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ. The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:453–463
  15. Gutschalk A, Patterson RD, Rupp A, Uppenkamp S, Scherg M. Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 2002;15:207–216
  16. Gutschalk A, Patterson RD, Scherg M, Uppenkamp S, Rupp A. Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 2004;22:755–766
  17. Gutschalk A, Patterson RD, Scherg M, Uppenkamp S, Rupp A. The effect of temporal context on the sustained pitch response in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:552–561
  18. Hari R, Aittoniemi K, Jarvinen ML, Katila T, Varpula T. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Localization of neural generators. Exp Brain Res. 1980;40:237–240
  19. Hari R, Rif J, Tiihonen J, Sams M. Neuromagnetic mismatch fields to single and paired tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;82:152–154
  20. Huotilainen M, Winkler I, Alho K, Escera C, Virtanen J, Ilmoniemi RJ, et al. Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108:370–379
  21. Imada T, Hari R, Loveless N, McEvoy L, Sams M. Determinants of the auditory mismatch response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;87:144–153
  22. Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Bonmassar G, Dale AM, Ilmoniemi RJ, Levänen S, et al. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:6809–6814
  23. Krumbholz K, Patterson RD, Seither-Preisler A, Lammertmann C, Lutkenhoner B. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl’s gyrus. Cereb Cortex. 2003;13:765–772
  24. Levänen S, Hari R, McEvoy L, Sams M. Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Exp Brain Res. 1993;97:177–183
  25. Loveless N, Levänen S, Jousmaki V, Sams M, Hari R. Temporal integration in auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;100:220–228
  26. Malmierca MS, Cristaudo S, Perez-Gonzalez D, Covey E. Stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the anesthetized rat. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5483–5493
  27. Malone BJ, Scott BH, Semple MN. Context-dependent adaptive coding of interaural phase disparity in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. J Neurosci. 2002;22:4625–4638
  28. Mathiak K, Rapp A, Kircher TT, Grodd W, Hertrich I, Weiskopf N, et al. Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole-head magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;16:190–195
  29. May P, Tiitinen H, Ilmoniemi RJ, Nyman G, Taylor JG, Näätänen R. Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. J Comput Neurosci. 1999;6:99–120
  30. McEvoy L, Levänen S, Loveless N. Temporal characteristics of auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:308–316
  31. Molholm S, Martinez A, Ritter W, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. The neural circuitry of pre-attentive auditory change-detection: an fMRI study of pitch and duration mismatch negativity generators. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:545–551
  32. Morosan P, Rademacher J, Schleicher A, Amunts K, Schormann T, Zilles K. Human primary auditory cortex: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and mapping into a spatial reference system. Neuroimage. 2001;13:684–701
  33. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992;
  34. Näätänen R, Gaillard AW, Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1978;42:313–329
  35. Näätänen R, Paaviläinen P, Rinne T, Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:2544–2590
  36. Näätänen R, Picton TW. N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1986;38:169–186
  37. Näätänen R, Sams M, Alho K, Paavilainen P, Reinikainen K, Sokolov EN. Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;69:523–531
  38. Nager W, Teder-Sälejärvi W, Kunze S, Münte TF. Preattentive evaluation of multiple perceptual streams in human audition. NeuroReport. 2003;14:871–874
  39. Otten LJ, Alain C, Picton TW. Effects of visual attentional load on auditory processing. NeuroReport. 2000;11:875–880
  40. Pantev C, Eulitz C, Hampson S, Ross B, Roberts LE. The auditory evoked “off” response: sources and comparison with the “on” and the “sustained” responses. Ear Hear. 1996;17:255–265
  41. Picton TW, Alain C, Otten L, Ritter W, Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol. 2000;5:111–139
  42. Picton TW, Woods DL, Proulx GB. Human auditory sustained potentials. I. The nature of the response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978;45:186–197
  43. Picton TW, Woods DL, Proulx GB. Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978;45:198–210
  44. Rivier F, Clarke S. Cytochrome oxidase, acetylcholinesterase, and NADPH-diaphorase staining in human supratemporal and insular cortex: evidence for multiple auditory areas. Neuroimage. 1997;6:288–304
  45. Rohrbaugh JW, Syndulko K, Lindsley DB. Cortical slow negative waves following non-paired stimuli: effects of task factors. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978;45:551–557
  46. Rohrbaugh JW, Syndulko K, Lindsley DB. Cortical slow negative waves following non-paired stimuli: effects of modality, intensity and rate of stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979;46:416–427
  47. Sams M, Hari R, Rif J, Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 sec: neuromagnetic evidence. J Cogn Neurosci. 1993;5:363–370
  48. Sams M, Kaukoranta E, Hämäläinen M, Näätänen R. Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. Psychophysiology. 1991;28:21–29
  49. Scherg M, Vajsar J, Picton TW. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potential. J Cogn Neurosci. 1989;1:336–355
  50. Scherg M, Von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;65:344–360
  51. Schönwiesner M, Novitski N, Pakarinen S, Carlson S, Tervaniemi M, Näätänen R. Heschl’s gyrus, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex have different roles in the detection of acoustic changes. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:2075–2082
  52. Schröger E. Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology. 1995;32:55–65
  53. Takegata R, Paavilainen P, Näätänen R, Winkler I. Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions in humans as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Neurosci Lett. 1999;266:109–112
  54. Tiitinen H, Alho K, Huotilainen M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Simola J, Näätänen R. Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology. 1993;30:537–540
  55. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I. Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10440–10453
  56. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:391–398
  57. Wolff C, Schröger E. Human pre-attentive auditory change-detection with single, double, and triple deviations as revealed by mismatch negativity additivity. Neurosci Lett. 2001;311:37–40

PII: S1388-2457(09)00752-4

doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.088

Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 121, Issue 4 , Pages 524-532 , April 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution