Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 121, Issue 4 , Pages 508-515 , April 2010

Cortical dynamics of a self driven choice: A MEG study during a card sorting task

  • Marie-Anne Hénaff

      Affiliations

    • INSERM, U821, Lyon F-69500, France
    • Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences, Lyon F-69000, France
    • Université Lyon 1, Lyon F-69000, France
  • ,
  • Dimitri Bayle

      Affiliations

    • INSERM, U821, Lyon F-69500, France
    • Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences, Lyon F-69000, France
    • Université Lyon 1, Lyon F-69000, France
  • ,
  • Pierre Krolak-Salmon

      Affiliations

    • INSERM, U821, Lyon F-69500, France
    • Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences, Lyon F-69000, France
    • Université Lyon 1, Lyon F-69000, France
    • Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon F-69003, France
  • ,
  • Pierre Fonlupt

      Affiliations

    • INSERM, U821, Lyon F-69500, France
    • Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences, Lyon F-69000, France
    • Université Lyon 1, Lyon F-69000, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Addresses: INSERM, Unité 821, Dynamique Cérébrale et Cognition, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bâtiment 452, 95 Boulevard Pinel, Bron F-69500, France; INSERM, Unité 821, Bron Cedex 69675, France. Tel.: +33 04 72 13 89 00; fax: +33 04 72 13 89 01.

,Accepted 26 November 2009.

References 

  1. Bayless SJ, Gaetz WC, Cheyne DO, Taylor MJ. Spatiotemporal analysis of feedback processing during a card sorting task using spatially filtered MEG. Neurosci Lett. 2006;410:31–36
  2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate – a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B. 1995;57:289–300
  3. Caclin A, Fonlupt P. Functional and effective connectivity in an fMRI study of an auditory-related task. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:2531–2537
  4. Chaminade T, Fonlupt P. Changes of effective connectivity between the lateral and medial parts of the prefrontal cortex during a visual task. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;18:675–679
  5. Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:913–919
  6. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:201–215
  7. D’Argembeau A, Ruby P, Collette F, Degueldre C, Balteau E, Luxen A, et al. Distinct regions of the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with self-referential processing and perspective taking. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:935–944
  8. Fangmeier T, Knauff M, Ruff CC, Sloutsky V. FMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18:320–334
  9. Fonlupt P, Bayle D, Henaff M. Effect of regressing blink and saccade artefacts out of MEG signals. 14th Annual Meeying of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, 2008.
  10. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9673–9678
  11. Frey SH. What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex. 2007;43:368–375
  12. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 2002;15:870–878
  13. Goldberg I, Ullman S, Malach R. Neuronal correlates of “free will” are associated with regional specialization in the human intrinsic/default network. Conscious Cogn. 2008;17:587–601
  14. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983;55:468–484
  15. Gusnard DA, Akbudak E, Shulman GL, Raichle ME. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:4259–4264
  16. Gusnard DA, Raichle ME. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:685–694
  17. Herdman AT, Wollbrink A, Chau W, Ishii R, Ross B, Pantev C. Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry. Neuroimage. 2003;20:995–1005
  18. Hillebrand A, Barnes GR. Beamformer analysis of MEG data. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;68:149–171
  19. Konishi S, Nakajima K, Uchida I, Kameyama M, Nakahara K, Sekihara K, et al. Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1:80–84
  20. Kuriki I, Sadamoto K, Takeda T. MEG recording from the human ventro-occipital cortex in response to isoluminant color stimulation. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22:283–293
  21. Mattout J, Phillips C, Penny WD, Rugg MD, Friston KJ. MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework. Neuroimage. 2006;30:753–767
  22. Mazoyer P, Wicker B, Fonlupt P. A neural network elicited by parametric manipulation of the attention load. Neuroreport. 2002;13:2331–2334
  23. Mitchell JP, Banaji MR, Macrae CN. General and specific contributions of the medial prefrontal cortex to knowledge about mental states. Neuroimage. 2005;28:757–762
  24. Monchi O, Petrides M, Petre V, Worsley K, Dagher A. Wisconsin Card Sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7733–7741
  25. Perianez JA, Maestu F, Barcelo F, Fernandez A, Amo C, Ortiz Alonso T. Spatiotemporal brain dynamics during preparatory set shifting: MEG evidence. Neuroimage. 2004;21:687–695
  26. Posner MI, Dehaene S. Attentional networks. Trends Neurosci. 1994;17:75–79
  27. Raichle ME, Snyder AZ. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage 2007;37:1083–90; discussion 1097–9.
  28. Rees G, Frackowiak R, Frith C. Two modulatory effects of attention that mediate object categorization in human cortex. Science. 1997;275:835–838
  29. Smith AB, Taylor E, Brammer M, Rubia K. Neural correlates of switching set as measured in fast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004;21:247–256
  30. Specht K, Lie CH, Shah NJ, Fink GR. Disentangling the prefrontal network for rule selection by means of a non-verbal variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008;
  31. Wang L, Kakigi R, Hoshiyama M. Neural activities during Wisconsin Card Sorting Test – MEG observation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001;12:19–31
  32. Wicker B, Ruby P, Royet JP, Fonlupt P. A relation between rest and the self in the brain?. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003;43:224–230

PII: S1388-2457(09)00746-9

doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.082

Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 121, Issue 4 , Pages 508-515 , April 2010