Elsevier

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volume 120, Issue 8, August 2009, Pages 1514-1524
Clinical Neurophysiology

Cortical evoked potentials to an auditory illusion: Binaural beats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To define brain activity corresponding to an auditory illusion of 3 and 6 Hz binaural beats in 250 Hz or 1000 Hz base frequencies, and compare it to the sound onset response.

Methods

Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were recorded in response to unmodulated tones of 250 or 1000 Hz to one ear and 3 or 6 Hz higher to the other, creating an illusion of amplitude modulations (beats) of 3 Hz and 6 Hz, in base frequencies of 250 Hz and 1000 Hz. Tones were 2000 ms in duration and presented with approximately 1 s intervals. Latency, amplitude and source current density estimates of ERP components to tone onset and subsequent beats-evoked oscillations were determined and compared across beat frequencies with both base frequencies.

Results

All stimuli evoked tone-onset P50, N100 and P200 components followed by oscillations corresponding to the beat frequency, and a subsequent tone-offset complex. Beats-evoked oscillations were higher in amplitude with the low base frequency and to the low beat frequency. Sources of the beats-evoked oscillations across all stimulus conditions located mostly to left lateral and inferior temporal lobe areas in all stimulus conditions. Onset-evoked components were not different across stimulus conditions; P50 had significantly different sources than the beats-evoked oscillations; and N100 and P200 sources located to the same temporal lobe regions as beats-evoked oscillations, but were bilateral and also included frontal and parietal contributions.

Conclusions

Neural activity with slightly different volley frequencies from left and right ear converges and interacts in the central auditory brainstem pathways to generate beats of neural activity to modulate activities in the left temporal lobe, giving rise to the illusion of binaural beats. Cortical potentials recorded to binaural beats are distinct from onset responses.

Significance

Brain activity corresponding to an auditory illusion of low frequency beats can be recorded from the scalp.

Introduction

When two sinusoids with slightly different frequencies are superimposed, their interference results in periodic amplitude fluctuations whose frequency corresponds to the frequency difference between the sinusoids. When sound with slightly different frequencies is mixed in the same ear, the fluctuations in the intensity of the sound are perceived as beats, reflecting the acoustic properties of the stimulus and are thus called acoustic beats. When a tone of one frequency and steady intensity is presented to one ear and a slightly different frequency is presented to the other ear, a perception of beats is experienced, with a beat frequency corresponding to the frequency difference between the two ears. These beats do not reflect a physical property of the sound, but probably the convergence of neural activity from the two ears in the central binaural auditory pathways of the brain. The intensity changes in the perceived sound are therefore called “binaural beats”. Binaural beats are present when the disparate frequencies to the two ears are low, and beats are difficult to hear at frequencies above 1000 Hz (Licklider et al., 1950).

The most widely accepted physiological explanation for binaural beats suggests that discharges of neurons that preserve phase information of the sound in each ear according to the volley principle (Rose et al., 1968, Palmer and Russel, 1986, Goldberg and Brownell, 1973) converge on binaurally-activated neurons in the ascending auditory pathway (Kuwada et al., 1979, McAlpine et al., 1996, McAlpine et al., 1998, Spitzer and Semple, 1998) that, in turn, generate the neurophysiological correlate of binaural beats (Wernick and Starr, 1968) in the brainstem.

Normative human studies on binaural beats showed differences between the subjective rhythm perceived and the difference between the two frequencies, indicating a central effect (Fritze, 1985). Clinical studies of binaural beats in humans varied in their sensitivity to cortical damage. Some reported that binaural beats were not sensitive to cortical damage (Noffsinger, 1982) but others showed that binaural beats could not be perceived by patients with cortical lesions associated with severe aphasia (Barr et al., 1977). A detailed study of a single patient with Auditory Neuropathy reported that a marked impairment of binaural beats was observed in conjunction with impaired auditory perceptions dependent on temporal cues, such as lateralization of binaural clicks, change of binaural masked threshold with changes in signal phase, detection of paired monaural clicks, monaural detection of a silent gap in a sound, and monaural threshold elevation for short duration tones (Starr et al., 1991). Effects of binaural beats at the Beta EEG frequency on psychomotor performance, mood and arousal (Lane et al., 1998) have also been reported.

Thus, animal experiments indicate the auditory brainstem as the level of binaural beat formation, human studies agree that binaural beats are a central effect which is sensitive to temporal acoustic cues and which may interact with cortical function.

Although the psychoacoustic effect of binaural beats has been well-studied in normals and patients, only very few studies reported ERP correlates of binaural beats. Two studies recorded auditory steady-state responses to a binaural beat frequency of 40 Hz. In the first (Schwarz and Taylor, 2005), the right and left ears were stimulated with tones differing in frequency by 40 Hz, and binaural beat steady-state potentials were recorded. A 40-Hz binaural beat potential was evoked with a low base stimulus frequency (400 Hz) but became undetectable when base frequency was above 3 kHz. In another study (Karino et al., 2006), magnetic fields evoked by beats of 4.00 or 6.66 Hz in base frequencies of 240 and 480 Hz were described. The fields showed small but sufficient amplitudes to be distinguished from the noise in the recordings. Spectral analyses of the magnetic fields revealed that the responses contained a specific spectral component of the beat frequency. Source estimates suggested multiple sources in the left and right auditory cortices and in parietal and frontal cortices. The phase of the beat-evoked waveforms showed great variability, suggesting that the responses did not represent changing interaural phase differences but a cognitive process corresponding to subjective fluctuations of binaural beats. More recently, 40 Hz binaural beats of a 500 Hz base frequency were used to evoke steady-state magnetic fields which were also compared with the transient-evoked N1m (Draganova et al., 2008). The auditory steady-state sources were lateralized to the right hemisphere and were anterior, inferior, and medial compared with onset N1m sources.

Two of the three previous reports on electrophysiological correlates of binaural beats used a beat frequency of 40 Hz. This frequency is optimal for thalamic and primary cortical steady-state activity, but later cortical contributions associated with perception are markedly attenuated at this rate. Moreover, the filter properties of scalp and skull attenuate 40 Hz potentials relative to lower frequencies and this attenuation of a beat frequency of 40 Hz may impede the detection and characterization of the slower brain activity associated with the perception of binaural beats. There is disagreement among previous studies on the sources of the beat-evoked oscillations: One study found bilateral sources in temporal lobe (Karino et al., 2006) while in the other – sources were lateralized to the right (Draganova et al., 2008).

The purpose of this study was to define cortical auditory evoked potentials to binaural beats of 3 or 6 Hz in high- (1000 Hz) and low- (250 Hz) base frequency tones, and to estimate their intracranial sources. Potentials to the onset of the tones were also recorded for comparison.

Section snippets

Subjects

Eighteen (16 men and 2 women) 18 to 25 years old right handed normal hearing subjects participated in the study. Subjects were paid for their participation and all procedures were approved by the institutional review board for experiments involving human subjects (Helsinki Committee).

Stimuli

Binaural tone bursts of 2000 ms duration and 70 dBnHL intensity were presented through earphones (Sony MDR-CD770) with a flat frequency response (within 10 dB across the frequency range 100–10,000 Hz). Tones were

Results

All subjects reported perceiving beats in all four stimulus conditions (3 and 6 Hz beats in 250 and 1000 Hz base frequencies). The beats were described as faint to comfortable and as emanating from the center of the head. At onset, the binaural tones evoked components beginning with a P50, N100 and P200, followed by a positive peak labeled P200 and a negativity termed N0, followed by repetitive negative/positive oscillations corresponding to the frequency difference between left and right ear.

The results of this study

In this study brain potentials associated with the auditory illusion of binaural beats were recorded and compared across two beat frequencies with tone bursts of two base frequencies. Beat-evoked oscillations were preceded by tone-onset components P50, N100 and P200, and were followed by tone-offset components. Sources of the beats-evoked oscillations across all stimulus conditions were mostly in the left lateral and inferior temporal lobe. This lateralized temporal activity is in line with

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm that brain activity corresponding to an auditory illusion can be recorded from the scalp. The oscillations associated with binaural beats were larger to low- than to high frequency sound, congruent with the involvement in this illusion of ‘volley principle’ neural encoding. The results are in line with the suggested mechanism of binaural beats: neural volleys with slightly different frequencies from left and right ear converge and interfere in the central

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation, by Grant DC 02618 from the National Institutes of Health and by the Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences.

References (54)

  • D. McAlpine et al.

    Interaural delay sensitivity and the classification of low best-frequency binaural responses in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig

    Hear Res

    (1996)
  • T. McGee et al.

    Contributions of medial geniculate body subdivisions to the middle latency response

    Hear Res

    (1992)
  • H.J. Michalewski et al.

    Auditory temporal processes in normal-hearing individuals and in patients with auditory neuropathy

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2005)
  • G. Moushegian et al.

    Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1973)
  • A.R. Palmer et al.

    Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair cells

    Hear Res

    (1986)
  • R.D. Pascual-Marqui et al.

    Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain

    Int J Psychophysiol

    (1994)
  • C. Ponton et al.

    Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2002)
  • H. Pratt et al.

    The composite N1 component to gaps in noise

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2005)
  • H. Pratt et al.

    The N1 complex to gaps in noise: effects of preceding noise duration and intensity

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • M. Scherg et al.

    Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1985)
  • M. Scherg et al.

    Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1986)
  • D.W.F. Schwarz et al.

    Human auditory steady state responses to binaural and monaural beats

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2005)
  • A. Sinai et al.

    High-resolution time course of hemispheric dominance revealed by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2003)
  • H.G. Vaughan et al.

    The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1970)
  • M. Vaz Pato et al.

    Cortical processing of complex tone stimuli: mismatch negativity at the end of a period of rapid pitch modulation

    Cog Brain Res

    (1999)
  • D.F. Barr et al.

    Application of binaural beat phenomenon with aphasic patients

    Arch Otolaryngol

    (1977)
  • R. Draganova et al.

    Cortical steady-state responses to central and peripheral auditory beats

    Cereb Cortex

    (2008)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Higuchi fractal dimension: An efficient approach to detection of brain entrainment to theta binaural beats

      2021, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, nonlinear methods outperformed the conventional spectral measures in psychological [74], physiological [113], and behavioral [114] studies. To the best of our knowledge, the previous works in BB literature have mainly utilized linear features, such as amplitude [36,37,104], latency [36,37], power spectrum [33,37–39,44], phase of the Fourier transform [33], imaginary part of coherence (iCoh) [39,44], Hilbert transform [33,38], to analyze the brain signals in response to BB stimulation. Although these approaches produced promising results, there may still be some aspects (e.g., complexity) left to be taken into account, which cannot be investigated through linear methods.

    • Effects of aging on event-related potentials to single-cycle binaural beats and diotic amplitude modulation of a tone

      2020, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      If this fact is considered together with the expected negative effect of the slow BB onset on the response amplitude (Kodera et al., 1979), it becomes evident that periodic responses to similar SS BB stimuli can only be recorded with very small amplitudes. Even recorded, such SS BB responses appear as roughly sinusoidal undulations (Hink et al., 1980; Pratt et al., 2009; Schwarz and Taylor, 2005); and, therefore, they do not permit identification of specific response components and estimation of their hierarchically plausible sources in the brain by using peak-latency information. It is for this reason that identification and measurement of the N1-P2 complex, which is known to be a typical long-latency response component originating in the auditory cortex (e.g., Papanicolaou et al., 1990; Scherg et al., 1989; Ungan et al., 2001), would have been hardly possible with SS BB responses.

    • Cumulative effects of theta binaural beats on brain power and functional connectivity

      2018, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although such studies could help us gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon, but again they have not all added up to a unified explanation. For instance, whilst Pratt could detect activities in the left temporal lobe due to binaural beats [22,23], a pilot study by Wahbe dismissed any variations related to this stimulation in the brain [5]. Two other works utilized MEG and both found out the cerebral cortex can be synchronized with slow binaural beating [24,25], and another study examined power and phase synchronization changes on intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) for epilepsy patients and reported significant modulation in different parts of the brain [26].

    • Mismatch negativity to acoustical illusion of beat: How and where the change detection takes place?

      2014, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      The stimulus parameters in this work were determined to guarantee electrophysiological and behavioral detection of binaural beats. The neurophysiological and psychoacoustic effects of the binaural beats were found to be stronger for frequency difference smaller than 30 Hz (Oster, 1973; Pratt et al., 2009). Therefore, the Δf between the two primary tones was set to 26 Hz.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text