Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 120, Issue 1 , Pages 73-79, January 2009

Do children with ADHD and/or PDD-NOS differ in reactivity of alpha/theta ERD/ERS to manipulations of cognitive load and stimulus relevance?

  • H. Karin Gomarus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +3150 3681253; fax: +3150 3681120.
  • ,
  • Albertus A. Wijers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Ruud B. Minderaa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Monika Althaus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

Accepted 14 October 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

We examined whether the method of event-related (de-)synchronization (ERD/ERS) revealed differential effects of selective attention and working memory load in children (8–11 years) with pervasive developmental disorder – not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Methods

Fifteen healthy controls and three equally large groups of children with symptoms of PDD-NOS, ADHD or both (PDD/HD) performed a visual selective memory search task. The EEG was recorded from which occipital alpha and frontal theta were derived.

Results

The effects of the overall task manipulations of task load, relevance and target/nontarget were clearly present in the overall analyses of alpha and theta ERD/ERS. However, no significant differences with respect to these manipulations existed between any of the subject groups.

Conclusions

The results supply no evidence for a distinction in information processing abilities of selective attention and working memory as reflected by alpha and theta ERD/ERS between children diagnosed with either ADHD, PDD-NOS or healthy controls.

Significance

Alpha and theta ERD/ERS are sensitive to manipulations of task load, relevance and target/nontarget, but supply no additional information on possible group differences in comparison to the more frequently used method of event-related potentials.

Keywords: Selective attention, Working memory, ADHD, PDD-NOS, Alpha, Theta, Event-related desynchronization/synchronization

 

PII: S1388-2457(08)01024-9

doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.017

Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 120, Issue 1 , Pages 73-79, January 2009