Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 114, Issue 10 , Pages 1891-1895, October 2003

Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter and puborectal muscle: reproducibility of latencies

  • Soren Brostrom

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Glostrup County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, DK-2600 Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +45-35435563; fax: +45-43233974
  • ,
  • Poul Jennum

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Glostrup County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, DK-2600 Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Gunnar Lose

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Glostrup County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, DK-2600 Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark

Accepted 27 May 2003.

Abstract 

Objective: Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test the motor efferents to the pelvic floor muscles. The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term test–retest reproducibility of pelvic floor MEPs.

Methods: Eighteen healthy women without evidence of neurological or lower urinary diseases had serial measurements of pelvic floor MEPs with a mean test–retest interval of 39 weeks. Cortical and spinal transcutaneous magnetic stimulations were applied. Evoked potentials were recorded with concentric needle electrodes placed in the striated urethral sphincter and the puborectal muscle by a transvaginal route. Responses from the abductor hallucis were also recorded for comparison. Stimulations were performed with relaxed pelvic floor and with tonic contraction (facilitated responses). Student's t test was applied and mean latencies were plotted against differences to analyze test–retest variability.

Results: There were no systematic effects of time or other variables that might differ between trials for all subjects. However, the means vs. differences plots revealed a large scatter of intra-individual test–retest values. The poor reproducibility was common for all tested pelvic floor muscles and modalities.

Conclusions: The clinical use of pelvic floor MEPs is questionable.

Keywords:  Urethral sphincter, Pelvic floor, Evoked potentials, Motor, Reproducibility of results

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1388-2457(03)00199-8

doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00199-8

Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 114, Issue 10 , Pages 1891-1895, October 2003